Not an outcome I was expecting…

Share this article...

For a few days now, I have been expecting the DWP to announce their response to the recent Consultation on pension charges. Those that have been following this story will be aware that this response is pivotal for employers and the pensions industry, as it will shape decisions on which schemes can be used for Pensions Auto-Enrolment (AE) purposes, and also indicate if many schemes that have already been utilised will have to be unravelled to comply with the new edict.

But a news items today directed me towards the Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC). I must admit that this was a branch of Government that has not previously crossed my radar (or that of many of our followers I should think), so let’s start off with a quote from their website:

“We provide the government with external, independent scrutiny of new regulatory and deregulatory proposals.”

Which seems fairly self-explanatory.

The news item from Employee Benefits Magazine can be viewed here:

https://www.employeebenefits.co.uk/benefits/pensions/pension-charge-cap-assessment-deemed-not-fit-for-purpose/103858.article

And following the link through will take you to the RPC opinion on the Charges Consultation. The Overall Assessment is “RED” - which gives a clue as to the direction of travel. And the opening paragraph reads as follows:

“The IA [Impact Assessment] is not fit for purpose. In particular, the evidence presented does not adequately demonstrate why Option 3 is considered to have a zero net impact on the pensions industry. In addition, robust estimates for all options need to be presented, so that consultees, and ultimately the final policy decision, are informed effectively.”

As you will see from the article, it looks like DWP are not accepting this summary, but it will be interesting to see if this then leaves any room for a legal challenge to whatever the actual outcomes of the consultation are. On indeed any additional delays to the consultations itself.

At the very least, this will only serve to cloud an already overcast picture of complexity and uncertainty. We shall have to wait and see.

Best regards

Steve

Share this article...

About the author

Steve Herbert is an award-winning thought leader on Pensions and Employee Benefit issues. His principal aim is better communicating the value and usage of employee benefits to employers. This he has achieved through many (highly successful) seminar series over the last decade, and his regular and widely read blog posts on the subject.
He also acts as a judge in HR and Employee Benefits industry awards, article writer, and product innovator. Steve is a regular contributor to DWP forums and compulsive responder to formal Government Consultations on pension and employee benefit issues. He is occasionally accused of making employee benefits interesting.